The NCAAA accreditation pipeline

Your semester's
paperwork. Done by Tuesday.

One course intake. Six NCAAA-compliant documents — course specs, lecture slides, exam papers, CLO maps, course reports, attainment dashboards — connected end-to-end. No copy-pasting between templates. No weekend rewrites.

Built and tested on real KAU courses: MLS 425 MLT 641
course intake → 6 documents 22 min  vs 32 hrs manual
01 Course Specification TPG-153 Free
02 Lecture Slides ×14 weeks Generating
03 Exam Paper FAMS-ready Queued
04 CLO Question Map Blueprint Queued
05 Course Report TPG-154 Queued
06 CLO Attainment Live dashboard Queued
source: MLT 641 — Advanced Forensic Chemistry auto-reuses Step 1–9 data
Proven on
King Abdulaziz University KAU Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences MLS 425 · MLT 641 FAMS & NCAAA current templates
The pipeline

Six documents.
One source of truth.

Every NCAAA artifact your QA committee asks for, generated from the same course intake you fill in once. Stop maintaining six Word files in parallel.

Built for Saudi accreditation

The platform actually built for NCAAA.

International QA software is built for ABET or AACSB. They don't know FAMS, the KAU internal QA cycle, or the document codes the National Center asks for by name.

N

NCAAA-native templates

Every output conforms to the current National Center templates — TPG-153, TP-153, TPG-154, TP-154, FAMS — down to the formatting that reviewers bounce: font, spacing, page numbers, the marks-and-time line beside every question.

K

KAU defaults pre-loaded

The standard grading scale, FAMS attainment targets, the quality assessment matrix used by Applied Medical Sciences, and a cascading dropdown of every Saudi public and private university with its colleges and departments. No retyping "King Abdulaziz University".

ع

Arabic-aware

Bilingual output for sections the review panel reads in Arabic. Correspondence in Arabic welcome — الرد بالعربية متاح. The QA director gets what they need in the language they need it in.

The math

One faculty member.
One semester.
Thirty-two hours back.

The accreditation paperwork that consumes a full work-week of every semester — produced from one course intake in an afternoon.

Numbers below are conservative estimates for a single course, drawn from QA-committee feedback at the Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences. Department- and university-wide savings scale linearly.

Task Manual With Pipeline Saved
Course Specification TPG-153 8 hrs 22 min −7.5 hrs
Lecture slides (14 weeks) · 14 hrs 35 min −13 hrs
Final exam paper FAMS 5 hrs 15 min −4.5 hrs
CLO question mapping blueprint 2 hrs auto −2 hrs
Course Report TPG-154 6 hrs 45 min −5 hrs
Attainment tracking semester 3 hrs live −3 hrs
Per course, per semester 38 hrs ~2 hrs ≈ 36 hrs back
Pricing

Pick the size of your accreditation cycle.

Course Specifications are free, forever. The rest of the pipeline is paid — priced per course, per department, or per university. Prices in SAR.

Faculty member

For the one course you have to submit this semester.

SAR 0 / course spec
  • Unlimited TPG-153 & TP-153 course specifications
  • 9-step guided intake with KAU defaults
  • JSON backup & re-import
  • Bilingual output
  • Email to chair, one click
Start a course spec
No card. No account.

Department / University

10–200 courses ahead of an accreditation cycle. Priced together.

Custom
  • Volume pricing across the full course catalogue
  • QA-office dashboard with portfolio-level CLO view
  • Single sign-on for faculty
  • Branded outputs (faculty & university)
  • Onboarding session with Dr. Torki
  • Arabic correspondence with the QA office
Talk to Dr. Torki
Typical engagement: 1 academic year
portrait
Dr. T. Alzughaibi
About the founder

I built this because I had to write the same six documents every semester for my own teaching load. The toolkit handles what software should always have handled.

Dr. Torki Alzughaibi Associate Professor of Forensic Science · Medical Laboratory Sciences, KAU
Advisor to the President, Kingdom University · Consultant, Forensic Medical Services Center (MoH)
Frequently asked

A few honest answers.

Free, forever, for as many course specifications as you need. It's the on-ramp. The pipeline modules — slides, exam, report, attainment — are the paid layer because they cost meaningfully more to run.
One component — the draft helper for CLO writing and exam-item generation — uses a language model. It produces a first draft that the author verifies against the syllabus and rewrites where needed. The model never decides what's in the final document. Everything else is rules, templates, and the NCAAA's published criteria.
Those platforms don't understand FAMS, the KAU internal QA cycle, or the specific NCAAA document codes. They make accreditation more expensive without making it shorter. This is built for the National Center's templates and the Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences' actual workflow.
Slides and Exam are next, targeting Q3 2026. Course Report and Attainment Tracker follow in Q4.
The free CS tool runs entirely in your browser — data stays local until you download the .docx. For paid modules with department dashboards, data is hosted on Saudi-resident infrastructure under a written data-handling agreement with your QA office.
Yes. Email below. A 30-minute call usually covers it — bring one of your real courses and we'll build the spec live.
Get started

Get your Saturday back.

Course specifications are free today. Sign in to start building your pipeline of slides, exams, reports, and attainment tracking.

OR WHATSAPP · +966 5X XXX XXXX · ARABIC WELCOME · الرد بالعربية متاح